Close Menu
  • Bayside News Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, July 6
Facebook X (Twitter)
Bayside News
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Police investigate Bonbeach collision
Breaking News
Bayside News
Home»News»Council condemned over dog killings
News

Council condemned over dog killings

Neil WalkerBy Neil Walker16 July 2014Updated:30 July 20141 Comment3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

TWO dogs at the centre of a long-running court battle were destroyed on the orders of Frankston Council last week.

The dogs, bull mastiff-cross Charlie and shar pei-cross Sharni, escaped from a Frankston backyard late last year and had been held in a council-run pound while their fate was decided (‘Decision dogs council’, The Times, 7/7/14).

Pet owners Shannon Holt and Evan Jeremiejczyk had taken council all the way to the Supreme Court in a bid to save the lives of the animals.

Lawyers for Companion Animals principal Anne Greenaway acted on behalf of the owners in their legal fight. Ms Greenaway said the killing of the dogs was “despicable and unnecessary”.

Council had refused to listen to animal experts, according to Ms Greenaway.

“They took a hardline stance from day one,” she said.

“An animal expert put both dogs through a temperament assessment and reported they posed no further danger to people or animals, yet they went ahead and put them down anyway.”

The dogs were “humanely euthanised” last Monday (7 July). Council issued a statement from the mayor, Cr Darrel Taylor, having previously refused to comment while legal appeals were being heard.

“This decision was not taken lightly, our council considers every such case carefully based on all the information available to ensure we act responsibly on behalf of our community,” the statement read.

“Due to the legal and case review process, council has not been in a position to fully respond to some provocative media coverage.”

At a Magistrates’ Court hearing in February, Ms Holt and Mr Jeremiejczyk pleaded guilty to charges of failing to register a dog, having a dog at large and a dog attack causing death.

The pair claimed council had offered not to seek an order to destroy the dogs if they pleaded guilty.

Cr Taylor said council had considered several aspects of the case when making the decision to destroy the animals.

“Following the guilty verdict council considered the attack in question, the cat owners’ views of the dogs returning to the community, the dogs’ history and the owners’ previous record of irresponsible pet ownership, which council was not in a position to release to the public.”

RSPCA South Australia and other interstate animal welfare groups last week offered to take the two dogs but it was rejected by council.

“Council did not accept these offers as they could not give a 100 per cent guarantee the dogs would not be a risk to people and animals when re-released into a community, and council was not prepared to hand over our legal and moral responsibilities,” Cr Taylor said.

Ms Greenaway said a fence through which the dogs had escaped had been fixed after many requests by the owners to the Department of Human Services.

“Councillors or officers never once visited the owners’ home to see that the fence had been fixed,” she said.

“I believe council has been really malicious and has treated my clients appallingly.”

Ms Greenaway said other councils were willing to heed experts’ views on potentially dangerous dogs but Frankston had “backed themselves into a corner by being so hardline from the start”.

“I think they didn’t want to release those dogs to anyone because they knew damn well that they weren’t dangerous,” she said.

“They knew they would have ‘egg on their faces’ if they did.”

First published in the Frankston Times

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Neil Walker

Related Posts

Tree milestone met

4 July 2025

Advocates celebrate abuse law change

3 July 2025

More money for emergency relief

3 July 2025

1 Comment

  1. Alice on 17 July 2014 11:10 am

    What a bunch of idiots at Frankston Council! So, they consider themselves animal experts? Show me their University Degrees in animal behaviour. Shame on them! The person responsible for this decision should be held accountable for this and should not be employed in a public position with making such absurd decisions. I hope they read this and are repaid in full for being so stupid and cruel. He/She must have a massive ego to protect! I bet the people who have to work with these people don’t like them either.

    ALL animals are unpredictable (including humans!). All dogs chase birds and cats. One random act does not make an animal dangerous to humans and the owners certainly were willing to go to any length to contain them after this. Frankston Council needs to be replace with intelligent thinking people.

    Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click Here to Read

1 July 2025
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click Here to Read

3 June 2025
Property of the Week

34 Pine Hill Drive, Frankston

21 March 2025
Council Watch

Council considers LGBTQIA+ initiatives

11 June 2025

New conditions applied to grants

4 June 2025
100 Years Ago this Week

Baxter – On The ‘Wallaby’ with a walking group

1 July 2025
Interviews

Writing racecourse history

6 February 2024
Contact

Street: 1/15 Wallis Drive, Hastings, 3915
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915

Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Police investigate Bonbeach collision
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook X (Twitter)
© 2025 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.