Close Menu
  • Bayside News Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Friday, March 6
Facebook X (Twitter)
Bayside News
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
Breaking News
Bayside News
Home»News»Height fight fails to stop city plan
News

Height fight fails to stop city plan

Neil WalkerBy Neil Walker15 June 2015Updated:18 July 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Reddit Threads Copy Link
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Reddit Threads Copy Link

THE shape and height of things to come in the centre of Frankston was hotly debated at last month’s council meeting.

Councillors voted to adopt the Frankston Metropolitan Activity Centre Structure Plan but some had misgivings about the scale of development, particularly with regards to high-rise buildings, which could follow in its wake.

The plan is a guide to future development and the use of public space in central Frankston including the Waterfront, Kananook Creek, Beauty Park, Monash University, Chisholm TAFE, Frankston Hospital, Bayside Shopping Centre, inner city Frankston homes, Ebdale Hub and the Carrum Downs industrial estate.

Council has asked Planning Minister Richard Wynne to authorise the exhibition of the Structure Plan, more than eight years after first debating its merits.

At last month’s council meeting the mayor Cr Sandra Mayer said it was important to get on with finalising a plan since the imminent $110 million redevelopment of Frankston train station, Chisholm TAFE and the surrounding area will be part of the changing landscape of central Frankston.

“We need a vision for the city … we need to get on with it,” she said.

Cr Glenn Aitken said residents valued Frankston as “a green place and appreciate the low scale of development” and believed a good balance of social and economic considerations should be paramount.

He slammed the plan as “a goldmine” for developers due to a lack of mandatory building height limits.

“In the future we [council] will be condemned,” he said.

Cr Aitken welcomed South East Water and its employees to the region but feared a repeat of the water authority’s towering building on Frankston’s coastline.

“What that building has done to our coastal landscape in Frankston has been extremely regrettable.”

Cr Suzette Tayler said she wished she had fought harder against the SEW building design.

“It is the most disgusting building I’ve ever seen. I didn’t expect it to look like that. I’m quite horrified and shocked and every time I look at it I hate it.

“I don’t want to see ‘another South East Water building’ along Nepean Highway.”

Crs Darrel Taylor and Colin Hampton backed the mayor’s push to put the Structure Plan to the Planning Minister.

Cr Hampton said “there’s a long way to go” before it is finalised and the community will have several chances during the process to provide feedback.

He said the plan is “good” overall despite having “things in this document I don’t agree with”.

“Do we want to sit on our hands and do nothing?” he asked.

Cr Taylor said Frankston should receive more funding from state governments if there is a formal plan for the city centre.

“We’ve got to have a plan and strategic development … otherwise it will be a hotchpotch approach.”

The plan was called “a farce” by Cr James Dooley since it referred to “preferred height limits” and not mandatory height restrictions for buildings.

The mayor said planning ministers “do not like prescriptive planning conditions”.

“This says we’re open for business … you will never please everybody,” Cr Mayer said.

Crs Hampton, Mayer, Michael O’Reilly, Rebekah Spelman and Darrel Taylor voted to adopt the Frankston Metropolitan Activity Centre Structure Plan.

Crs Aitken and Suzette Tayler opposed the plan while Cr Dooley abstained from voting.

Visit frankston.vic.gov.au to read the Structure Plan and see details about future community consultation.

First published in the Frankston Times – 15 June 2015

Neil Walker

Related Posts

Further two charged following alleged crime spree

6 March 2026

Community consultation on Australia Day

5 March 2026

Frankston hosts AI learning centre

5 March 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click Here to Read

2 February 2026
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click Here to Read

9 December 2025
Property of the Week

563 Nepean Highway, FRANKSTON

20 January 2026
Council Watch

Submissions open on vacant shop rates

24 February 2026

Overseas junket a ‘success’ – mayor

25 November 2025
100 Years Ago this Week

Benefit Concert in aid of Bush Fire Relief Fund

5 March 2026
Interviews

Writing racecourse history

6 February 2024
Contact

Street: 1/15 Wallis Drive, Hastings, 3915
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915

Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook X (Twitter)
© 2026 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.