Close Menu
  • Bayside News Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, July 6
Facebook X (Twitter)
Bayside News
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Police investigate Bonbeach collision
Breaking News
Bayside News
Home»News»Height fight fails to stop city plan
News

Height fight fails to stop city plan

Neil WalkerBy Neil Walker15 June 2015Updated:18 July 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

THE shape and height of things to come in the centre of Frankston was hotly debated at last month’s council meeting.

Councillors voted to adopt the Frankston Metropolitan Activity Centre Structure Plan but some had misgivings about the scale of development, particularly with regards to high-rise buildings, which could follow in its wake.

The plan is a guide to future development and the use of public space in central Frankston including the Waterfront, Kananook Creek, Beauty Park, Monash University, Chisholm TAFE, Frankston Hospital, Bayside Shopping Centre, inner city Frankston homes, Ebdale Hub and the Carrum Downs industrial estate.

Council has asked Planning Minister Richard Wynne to authorise the exhibition of the Structure Plan, more than eight years after first debating its merits.

At last month’s council meeting the mayor Cr Sandra Mayer said it was important to get on with finalising a plan since the imminent $110 million redevelopment of Frankston train station, Chisholm TAFE and the surrounding area will be part of the changing landscape of central Frankston.

“We need a vision for the city … we need to get on with it,” she said.

Cr Glenn Aitken said residents valued Frankston as “a green place and appreciate the low scale of development” and believed a good balance of social and economic considerations should be paramount.

He slammed the plan as “a goldmine” for developers due to a lack of mandatory building height limits.

“In the future we [council] will be condemned,” he said.

Cr Aitken welcomed South East Water and its employees to the region but feared a repeat of the water authority’s towering building on Frankston’s coastline.

“What that building has done to our coastal landscape in Frankston has been extremely regrettable.”

Cr Suzette Tayler said she wished she had fought harder against the SEW building design.

“It is the most disgusting building I’ve ever seen. I didn’t expect it to look like that. I’m quite horrified and shocked and every time I look at it I hate it.

“I don’t want to see ‘another South East Water building’ along Nepean Highway.”

Crs Darrel Taylor and Colin Hampton backed the mayor’s push to put the Structure Plan to the Planning Minister.

Cr Hampton said “there’s a long way to go” before it is finalised and the community will have several chances during the process to provide feedback.

He said the plan is “good” overall despite having “things in this document I don’t agree with”.

“Do we want to sit on our hands and do nothing?” he asked.

Cr Taylor said Frankston should receive more funding from state governments if there is a formal plan for the city centre.

“We’ve got to have a plan and strategic development … otherwise it will be a hotchpotch approach.”

The plan was called “a farce” by Cr James Dooley since it referred to “preferred height limits” and not mandatory height restrictions for buildings.

The mayor said planning ministers “do not like prescriptive planning conditions”.

“This says we’re open for business … you will never please everybody,” Cr Mayer said.

Crs Hampton, Mayer, Michael O’Reilly, Rebekah Spelman and Darrel Taylor voted to adopt the Frankston Metropolitan Activity Centre Structure Plan.

Crs Aitken and Suzette Tayler opposed the plan while Cr Dooley abstained from voting.

Visit frankston.vic.gov.au to read the Structure Plan and see details about future community consultation.

First published in the Frankston Times – 15 June 2015

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Neil Walker

Related Posts

Tree milestone met

4 July 2025

Advocates celebrate abuse law change

3 July 2025

More money for emergency relief

3 July 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click Here to Read

1 July 2025
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click Here to Read

3 June 2025
Property of the Week

34 Pine Hill Drive, Frankston

21 March 2025
Council Watch

Council considers LGBTQIA+ initiatives

11 June 2025

New conditions applied to grants

4 June 2025
100 Years Ago this Week

Baxter – On The ‘Wallaby’ with a walking group

1 July 2025
Interviews

Writing racecourse history

6 February 2024
Contact

Street: 1/15 Wallis Drive, Hastings, 3915
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915

Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Police investigate Bonbeach collision
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook X (Twitter)
© 2025 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.