• Bayside News Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Monday, August 8
Trending
  • Season on the line for Seagulls
  • Pythons face an uphill battle, Redlegs stumble
  • Ketch blown ashore in Dromana
  • New program for parking
  • Push to improve station access
  • Teens arrested in BMW
  • Plans form for upgraded youth clinic
  • Striking self-portrait secures art award
Facebook Twitter
Bayside News
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
Bayside News
Home»Latest News»GoPro helmet fine thrown out on appeal
Latest News

GoPro helmet fine thrown out on appeal

Bayside NewsBy Bayside News15 February 2016Updated:15 February 20161 Comment3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

THE case against a Victorian motorcyclist fined for having cameras attached to his helmet has been thrown out by a County Court judge on appeal.

Max Lichtenbaum was fined $289 and lost three demerit points after being pulled over by police in Frankston in March 2014 for wearing a helmet with cameras affixed.

Mr Lichtenbaum was found guilty in the Frankston Magistrates Court last year of not wearing an approved motorcycle helmet (‘No go for GoPro cams on helmets’, The Times 28/9/15).

Lawyers Maurice Blackburn appealed the magistrate’s decision, arguing successfully that the Australian Standard governing motorcycle helmets was not made freely accessible to the public by VicRoads, therefore, riders could not be found guilty of breaching a standard that was not publically available.

In handing down his decision in the County Court on Friday (12 February), Judge John Jordan said: “I am not satisfied with the magistrate’s order and dismiss the charge”.

Maurice Blackburn also argued during the appeal hearing that motorcycle helmets in Victoria needed to meet the relevant standard at the date of manufacture and supply. It was submitted that this meant helmets could not be considered non-compliant at a later date, such as if a camera was attached.

But because the first argument was accepted by Judge Jordan, he did not need to rule on the latter argument.

Maurice Blackburn principal Malcolm Cumming said the firm would continue lobbying for legislative change in relation to this aspect of the case.

“We need to get clarity and confirmation for motorcycle riders in Victoria that approval of the relevant standard applies at the date of manufacture and supply, and not beyond,” Mr Cumming said. “That will bring Victoria in line with the explicit position in Queensland, South Australia and, as of December last year, the ACT.”

He described the today’s appeal result as “a long time coming”.

“Since the matter was first brought to us by the Victorian Motorcycle Council, and preceded through various incarnations at the Frankston Magistrates Court where there was ultimately an unsuccessful outcome, then to appeal that outcome in the County Court and get a favourable result today, is fantastic and we’re all very pleased.”

Mr Lichtenbaum described the case as “very stressful,” but added: “I’m pleased that after two years it’s now over. I’m very safety conscious and put these cameras on my helmet at the time mainly for safety reasons. I feel safer knowing that if I have an accident I’ve got proof of what happened.”

Peter Baulch, from the Victorian Motorcycle Council, said the appeal was “a win for common sense”.

“This puts pressure now on VicRoads and regulatory authorities to recognise what they call at the national level as regulatory harmonisation. We poor motorcyclists simply call it uniform road rules right around Australia and that’s what’s needed,” he said.

First published in the Frankston Times – 15 February 2016

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Bayside News

Related Posts

Boxing world mourns loss of a champion

8 August 2022

Councillor conflict escalates to conduct panel

8 August 2022

Council presents plans for Parkdale skyrail

3 August 2022

1 Comment

  1. Lindsay on 15 February 2016 9:40 pm

    “Max Lichtenbaum was fined $289 and lost three demerit points”

    You do not lose demerit points, you gain them. That is why they’re called demerit points.

    Reply

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Aug 8, 2022 - Mon
Chelsea, Australia
11°C
2 km/h, E
55%
769.57 mmHg
mon08/08 tue08/09 wed08/10 thu08/11 fri08/12
11/8°C
11/7°C
14/11°C
13/11°C
15/10°C
Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click Here to Read

25 July 2022
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click Here to Read

26 May 2022
Council Watch

Kilkenny a minister

6 July 2022

Push to stop rate collection methods

14 June 2022
Interviews

Murder mystery on the water

25 July 2022
Property of the Week

14 Lynch Court, Mt Martha

26 July 2022
100 Years Ago this Week

Ketch blown ashore in Dromana

8 August 2022
Contact

Street: 63 Watt Road, Mornington, 3931
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915

Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook Twitter
© 2022 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.